TY  - THES
T1  - Enzymatic hydrolysis of vegetable and insect proteins using technical enzyme preparations
A1  - Großmann,Kora Kassandra
Y1  - 2023/02/07
N2  - The present dissertation covers the usage of technical enzyme preparations (TEPs) for vegetable and insect protein hydrolysis, due to the mounting interest in alternative protein sources to cover the increasing demand for food from a growing world population. The TEPs, as defined in this study, are enzyme preparations that include side activities and are used in food processing. Today, TEPs are used by food manufacturers based on the supplier’s information that usually states the main enzyme activity and includes information on side activities only in some cases. However, knowledge about the activity profile is crucial as side activities can contribute to the properties of the protein hydrolysates produced (e.g. degree of hydrolysis [DH], liberation of amino acids) and the final food product quality. 
In the first study, an automated photometric analyzer (GalleryTM Plus, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was introduced for the comprehensive activity determination of TEPs. The new setup of the analyzer covered 32 synthetic and natural substrates in order to determine aminopeptidase, carboxypeptidase, dipeptidylpeptidase and endopeptidase activities distinguishably. Accordingly, the overall proteolytic activity of TEPs was quantified and detailed information about the substrate spectra and peptidase side activities was generated. Furthermore, several batches of the industrial TEP Flavourzyme1000L were measured. By determining 32 peptidase activities, batch variations were shown. As Flavourzyme1000L is standardized by its supplier Novozymes on only one activity (leucine aminopeptidase), the additional 31 new peptidase activities determined showed differences of the side activities of the batches. In addition, the study showed that the detailed information of the peptidase activities of the TEPs could explain the properties of the resulting lupine protein hydrolysates (DH and liberation of amino acids). Due to the determination of 32 peptidase activities (so-called “activity fingerprint”), TEPs were selected specifically to increase, for example, the DH. The two TEPs P278 and DZM were selected due to their complementary peptidase activities, as an example of this study. The combination of these two TEPs resulted in an increase of the DH of 47%. Now, TEPs can be selected targeted more on the basis of their peptidase activities to, for example, increase the hydrolysis efficiency of lupine protein by combining complementary peptidase activities.
In the second study, six food-grade TEPs (Flavourzyme1000L, ProteaseP “Amano”6SD, DeltazymAPS-M-FG, Promod278, ProteAX-K and PeptidaseR) were investigated regarding their influence on the hydrolysis of soy, pea and canola protein. The hydrolysates were investigated analytically concerning their DH and free amino acid profiles and sensorically concerning the taste attributes umami and bitter. By using a random forest model, the taste attributes bitter and umami were connected to specific peptidase activities (exo- and endopeptidase activities). Furthermore, out of the six selected TEPs, the usage of ProteAX-K showed high umami and low bitter taste of the vegetable protein hydrolysates (soy, pea and canola). In line with the first study, the second study showed that the detailed information of the peptidase activities of the TEPs could explain the properties of the resulting vegetable protein hydrolysates. Based on these new insights, TEPs can be selected more specifically based on their peptidase activity profiles to direct the formation of desired taste attributes of the protein hydrolysates. 
In the third study, two TEPs with various peptidase activities (Flavourzyme1000L, ProteaseA “Amano”2SD) were applied for the hydrolysis of insect proteins. This study investigated the potential of cricket and mealworm protein and their hydrolysates regarding their sensory potential. The sensory profiles of the insect proteins were altered by, firstly, applying proteolytic hydrolysis and then a Maillard reaction (30 min, T = 98°C, 1% (w/v) xylose) to the hydrolysates. The initially earthy-like flavor of the insect proteins resulted in modified taste profiles described by e.g., savory-like attributes, due to both processing steps. Furthermore, 38 odor-active molecules (1 alcohol, 5 acids, 11 aldehydes, 5 ketones and 16 heterocyclic compounds) were identified by gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O). The identified molecules are also found in meat and edible seafood products. The third study showed that the flavoring profile of insect proteins was modified and can be developed further by the respective processing.

KW  - Enzym
KW  - Proteine
KW  - Hydrolyse
CY  - Hohenheim
PB  - Kommunikations-, Informations- und Medienzentrum der Universität Hohenheim
AD  - Garbenstr. 15, 70593 Stuttgart
UR  - http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/volltexte/2023/2120
ER  -