RT Dissertation/Thesis
T1 Profiling of physiological responses and quality aspects in Vitis vinifera L. as influenced by aspects of N application
A1 Lang,Carina Paola
WP 2020/03/12
AB Viticulture and the vinification of vines (Vitis vinifera L.) to wine is an important branch in agriculture world-wide. Berry quality and the associated wine quality are the driving factors here. Nitrogen (N) is the most important plant nutrient for the grapevine. In addition to its influence on vegetative and generative growth, it determines significantly the metabolite composition and the oenological parameters of the grape berry. Nitrogen is present in various forms, such as nitrate, ammonium or amino acid, in the individual plant organs and is used differently by the grapevine. Grapevines are believed to have the ability to assimilate N in various forms, which in turn may affect the quality of berries and the resulting wine. 
For a better understanding of the effects of N on berry and wine quality, knowledge of which N-form can be assimilated by the vine and the way that this affects oenological parameters and quality-giving metabolites is essential. To this end, several investigations were carried out at various test levels, starting with hydroponic experiments, a pot experiment and a further field experiment, and on the matured wine. The various N-forms of nitrate, ammonium, urea and the amino acids arginine and glutamine were applied, following which the plant-physiological reactions of the grapevine and quality-determining parameters in berry and wine were measured. Furthermore, a metabolite profile with a focus on phenolic components was prepared and a sensory analysis of the wine was performed. 
The grapevines in the hydroponics and pot experiments were treated with 4 mM total N. The grapevines in the field experiment were fertilized with 60 kg N ha-1, calculated in relation to the block size. The rootstocks SO4 and RU140 showed similar patterns of N assimilation with respect to the N-form but differed significantly with regard to the level of growth and N content among all N-forms. The N-sensitive rootstock SO4 reacted more strongly than the rootstock RU140 and, therefore, SO4 was used for further experiments. This suggests that grapevines are able to assimilate the amino acids glutamine and arginine, as also shown by the enzymatic nitrate reductase activity and the increased abundance of the transcripts of nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase. Nevertheless, the N-forms NO3- and NH4+ were preferentially assimilated. The assimilation under urea treatment was significantly reduced. In addition to the N-form, the amount of N applied had an influence on N assimilation in the grapevine. With increasing amounts, the vegetative and generative growth increased up to a threshold. However, if this threshold was exceeded, both were significantly reduced. If the grapevine is overfertilized, the sink : source ratio changes, which will lead to a change in the biomass production and furthermore to a saturation and storage of N. In addition, competition for assimilates occurs, this alters the N distribution and N availability within the plant and the berries. The N-form has no influence on berry yield. 
The oenological and chemical parameters of the must and the wine are of enormous importance for product quality. The key components include pH and acidity, which contribute significantly to the organoleptic properties of wine. Both factors are influenced by the N-form and the amount of N offered. As the amount of N increases, the pH increases and the acidity decreases. The N-forms NO3- and urea and, the zero application (without additional N) show the highest influences. The must weight is a defining factor reflecting the berrys maturity and thus the time of harvest. As the amount of N increases, the must weight decreases. On the one hand, an increased N amount leads to lower acidity in the berry, indicating that more sugar is being stored and that the berry is in an advanced stage of maturity. On the other hand, an increased N amount leads to a decreasing must weight, which leads further to a maturation delay. The total phenolic content increases with increasing N amount, but is highest following zero N application. Tentative phenols measured in the metabolite profile are markedly down-regulated after urea treatment and are upregulated with NO3- following NH4+ treatment. This result might arise from reduced N assimilation in the root and thus reduced N availability for the berries. 
The influence of N on the aroma and sensory aspects of wine is controversial. The individual aroma attributes show both an increase and a decrease in their intensity attributable to N, mainly urea and NO3-. A marked influence between N-treated vines and the zero application is also apparent. However, these contrasting results clearly show that aroma and thus the sensory characteristics of wine can be influenced both positively and negatively. 
The results of the aroma and sensory evaluation in the agroforestry system underline once again the controversial influence of N on the sensory features of wine; no significant influence was measured. 
In summary, N has a significant influence on the vegetative and generative growth of the grapevine. The influence of N can be both positive and negative and is in part directly or indirectly linked to wine quality and should therefore not be ignored.

K1 Qualität
K1 Stickstoff
K1  Weinrebe
PP Hohenheim
PB Kommunikations-, Informations- und Medienzentrum der Universität Hohenheim
UL http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/volltexte/2020/1719